Aliona Bolsova vs Julia Grabher Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Bolsova vs J. Grabher

Aliona Bolsova
ESP
l
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
1
Win
3
Played
2
Win
28
Age
29
-
Height
1.70m
231
C. Rank
92
88
Best Rank
54
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$818.2K
Career Money
$402.3K
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Julia Grabher
AUT
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
1
Win
3
Played
2
Win
28
Age
29
-
Height
1.70m
231
C. Rank
92
88
Best Rank
54
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$818.2K
Career Money
$402.3K
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Bolsova 1 - 2 Grabher
They have played 7 sets in total, with Aliona Bolsova winning 2 and Julia Grabher winning 5. The last match between Aliona Bolsova and Julia Grabher was at the W50 Spring, 17-02-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Aliona Bolsova getting the victory 6-2 6-7(4) 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Bolsova | 1 |
| Grabher | 2 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(Q1) W50 Spring(02-17-25)
Aliona Bolsova
6
6
6
Julia Grabher
2
7
3
(F) W60 San Sebastian(10-02-22)
Julia Grabher
6
7
Aliona Bolsova
3
6
(Q1) French Open - Paris(05-24-21)
Julia Grabher
6
6
Aliona Bolsova
2
3
A. Bolsova vs J. Grabher H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $818,218 | Career Prize Money | $402,254 |
| 60.62% (311-202) | Career Total W/L | 60.78% (423-273) |
| 0 | Clay | 2 |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 9 | Titles | 18 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 2 |
| 50.00% (1-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 21.43% (3-11) |
A. Bolsova vs J. Grabher Match Preview:
- Predicting performance based on recent second serve statistics: Bolsova and Grabher have displayed a remarkable level of skill in their second serve performance over the past six months. Bolsova has achieved an impressive 45.52% success rate on her second serve, while Grabher, not far behind, has secured a 43.78% success rate. It is worth noting that there is a notable correlation between the second serve performance and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Insights from return game stats: Analyzing the return game statistics of Bolsova and Grabher in recent matches reveals intriguing findings. Bolsova has demonstrated her prowess by triumphing in 54.88% of her opponents' second serve points, while Grabher has impressively emerged victorious in 55.95% of these points. The first serve return statistics further shed light on the forthcoming match, with Bolsova achieving a 46.8% success rate and Grabher boasting a 41.05% success rate. These figures serve as valuable indicators in determining the favored player in this highly-anticipated head-to-head clash.
- Under pressure: Breakpoint analysis: When assessing the ability to handle pressure, Bolsova and Grabher have showcased commendable skills in saving breakpoints in recent matches. Bolsova has managed to save 52.81% of breakpoints she faced, while Grabher has demonstrated an incredible 59.22% success rate in this regard. Such statistics prove to be invaluable for those engaging in in-game betting predictions.
- Evaluating overall performance: Examining the performances of Bolsova and Grabher over the past year, Bolsova has emerged victorious in 55.17% of her matches (with a win-loss record of 16 wins and 13 losses), while Grabher has achieved a win rate of 48.89% (with a win-loss record of 22 wins and 23 losses). These figures provide us with an overview of their head-to-head predictions and set the stage for an intriguing faceoff.
- Unveiling the dominance on different surfaces: Bolsova and Grabher's performances on various surfaces uncover interesting patterns. Bolsova excels on clay courts, boasting an impressive 65% career win rate (with a win-loss record of 195 wins and 104 losses). Conversely, her performance on grass courts has been relatively weaker, with a win rate of 33% (with a win-loss record of 3 wins and 6 losses). Grabher, similarly, dominates on clay courts with a win rate of 64% (with a win-loss record of 317 wins and 179 losses), while struggling on grass courts with a win rate of 20% (with a win-loss record of 1 win and 4 losses).
- Assessing player level and event context: In the past year, Bolsova has primarily competed in Challenger and ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10,000. During these tournaments, she achieved an impressive 59.26% win rate (with a win-loss record of 16 wins and 11 losses). Conversely, Grabher also participated in Challenger and ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10,000, demonstrating her skills by winning 60% of her matches (with a win-loss record of 21 wins and 14 losses). When predicting the favored player based on these statistics, it is important to consider the level of the events they have been competing in.
- Previous face-offs: Bolsova and Grabher have crossed paths on two occasions. Regrettably for Bolsova, she has yet to secure a victory against Grabher, who emerged triumphant in both encounters. Across these matches, Grabher dominated by winning all four sets played. The most recent encounter between these formidable opponents occurred in the W60 San Sebastian tournament on February 10, 2022, yielding a hard-fought victory for Julia Grabher, with a score of 6-3 7-6(3).
- Taking note of match duration: Previous matches between Bolsova and Grabher suggest that their encounters tend to be efficient and decisive. On average, these players have completed their matches in just under one hour and twenty-three minutes.
- Decoding the outcome of deciding sets: Bolsova and Grabher have engaged in nail-biting deciding sets on zero occasions in the past, leaving the outcome of such scenarios uncertain. While Bolsova has not emerged victorious in any deciding sets against Grabher, Grabher herself has yet to claim a win in this situation. Understanding how each player performs under such pressure can be influential in predicting the ultimate outcome if the match extends to a deciding set.
- Exploring head-to-head pressure situations: In the history of their encounters, Bolsova and Grabher have competed in a single tiebreak, with Grabher emerging victorious on that occasion. This statistic provides valuable insights into how these players handle extreme pressure situations against each other.
- Assessing opponent quality: Reviewing the opponents faced by Bolsova and Grabher over the past twelve months sheds light on their respective levels of competition. Bolsova's opponents boasted an average ranking of 236.79, showcasing her ability to challenge formidable players. In contrast, Grabher's opponents maintained an average ranking of 332.58, indicating the caliber of competition she has faced.
- Decisive set performance: For those interested in live predictions and betting opportunities, it is crucial to consider how Bolsova and Grabher perform in deciding sets. Bolsova has achieved an impressive 60% success rate in deciding sets over the past twelve months, displaying her ability to triumph in high-stakes scenarios. Meanwhile, Grabher boasts a 55% success rate in all matches played on tour, indicating her consistent performance when the outcome hangs in the balance.
- Focusing on current event statistics: While past player performances provide valuable insights, it is equally important to examine current event statistics to gauge a player's form. The section below offers a comprehensive analysis of the players' performances in the ongoing event. Additionally, it is essential to acknowledge that certain players thrive in specific events, and these factors must be taken into account when predicting the match outcome.
- Breakpoint conversion: A crucial statistic for live betting: Evaluating recent form, Bolsova and Grabher have shown proficiency in converting break point opportunities. Bolsova has capitalized on 52.36% of her breakpoint chances, while Grabher has similarly demonstrated her prowess by successfully converting 51.23% of her break point opportunities. These statistics prove indispensable for those seeking in-game betting strategies when players find themselves on the brink of breaking their opponent's serve.
- If you are eager to explore models that predict tennis match outcomes, the following article serves as an excellent starting point. However, it should be noted that it caters primarily to avid statistics enthusiasts.
Aliona Bolsova vs Julia Grabher Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Bolsova vs J. Grabher H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 32 | Games Won | 37 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 13 |
| 1:42:22 | Average Match Time | 1:42:22 |
| 72% (163/227) | 1st Serve % | 65% (149/228) |
| 56% (91/163) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (93/149) |
| 48% (31/64) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (38/79) |
| 42% (11/26) | Break Pts Won % | 48% (13/27) |
| 43% (97/228) | Return Points Win % | 46% (105/227) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Bolsova 43%, Grabher 47%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Bolsova 56%, Grabher 58%.
Break Points Saved %: Bolsova 53%, Grabher 56%.
A. Bolsova Recent Matches Played
J. Grabher Recent Matches Played

A. Bolsova vs J. Grabher Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.62% (311/202) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.78% (423/273) |
| 58.14% (686/494) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.14% (932/644) |
| 53.94% (5751/4911) | Games Win/Loss | 54.15% (7707/6526) |
| 53.54% (68/59) | Hard Win/Loss | 44.78% (30/37) |
| 64.24% (221/123) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.67% (373/195) |
| 57.58% (19/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 34.55% (19/36) |
| 33.33% (3/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 581 | Aces Total | 746 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.38 |
| 873 | Total Double Faults | 2631 |
| 1:16:27 | Average Match Time | 1:22:28 |
| 456.84 | Average Opponent Rank | 475.32 |
| 71% (18965/26813) | 1st Serve % | 65% (25496/39392) |
| 60% (11301/18965) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (15877/25496) |
| 46% (3571/7847) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (6208/13894) |
| 48% (1679/3500) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (2555/5214) |
| 47% (12597/26986) | Return Points Win % | 47% (18795/39983) |
| 44.19% (19/24) | Slam W/L | 34.48% (10/19) |
| 50.00% (8/8) | Masters W/L | 47.06% (8/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 31.82% (7/15) |
| 42.86% (21/28) | Main Tour W/L | 33.90% (20/39) |
| 62.42% (206/124) | Challenger W/L | 64.09% (282/158) |
| 76.00% (57/18) | Futures W/L | 74.42% (96/33) |
| 61% (308/508) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (416/683) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 45% (49/110) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (69/136) |
| 58% (92/158) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (103/191) |
| 87% (299/259) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (408/367) |
| 13% (299/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (408/40) |
| 24% (213/52) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (288/58) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
05:05 PM 14/11/25
PredictionW1
3.62
W2
1.24
04:50 PM 14/11/25
PredictionW1
1.94
W2
1.75
09:30 PM 14/11/25
PredictionW1
2.83
W2
1.37
05:00 AM 15/11/25
PredictionW1
2.33
W2
1.52
08:00 PM 14/11/25
PredictionW1
1.52
W2
2.33
08:00 AM 15/11/25
PredictionW1
1.81
W2
1.87
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
14 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Cristian Garin Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
14 Nov 2025
Roman Andres Burruchaga vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Jannik Sinner vs Ben Shelton Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Roman Andres Burruchaga vs Mariano Navone Betting Tips & Picks November 14, 2025
Top Predictions Today
16:05
H2H 12-0
22:30
H2H 6-3
H2H 2-1
18:39
H2H 1-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Orlando
United States
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal